WASHINGTON/TEHRAN (Agencies) – U.S. President Donald Trump has claimed that a preliminary agreement with Iran is expected to be signed “tomorrow,” signaling what he described as a major breakthrough in long-stalled negotiations aimed at ending tensions and moving toward a broader peace framework. However, Iranian officials have strongly denied any confirmation of a Sunday signing, creating confusion over the status of the proposed deal.
Speaking during a media briefing, Trump said both Washington and Tehran were “very close” to finalizing an initial agreement that would pave the way for formal diplomatic and technical-level talks in the coming week. He suggested that the deal could mark a turning point in U.S.-Iran relations, which have remained strained for years due to disputes over nuclear activities, regional influence, and sanctions.
“We are looking at something very historic,” Trump said, adding that the agreement would be “signed very soon, possibly tomorrow.” He further indicated that the next phase would involve technical delegations from both sides working out implementation details and verification mechanisms.
The announcement quickly drew international attention, with markets and diplomatic observers closely watching for confirmation. However, within hours, Iranian officials rejected the claim that any signing was scheduled for Sunday.
A spokesperson for Iran’s Foreign Ministry stated that while discussions with the United States and mediators were ongoing, “no agreement has been finalized and no signing ceremony has been scheduled.” The official emphasized that Iran remained committed to negotiations only if its core conditions, including sanctions relief and respect for its nuclear rights under international law, were fully addressed.
The contradictory statements have fueled uncertainty about the actual progress of the talks. Analysts say such public divergences are not uncommon in high-stakes diplomacy, particularly when both sides are under domestic political pressure.
According to diplomatic sources familiar with the negotiations, indirect talks between the two countries have been facilitated through mediators in recent weeks. The discussions reportedly focus on a phased agreement that could initially freeze certain nuclear-related activities in exchange for limited sanctions relief and a roadmap for broader normalization.
International reactions have been cautious. Several European officials have welcomed the possibility of progress but urged both sides to avoid premature announcements that could undermine trust in the negotiation process.
Security experts note that any breakthrough between Washington and Tehran would have far-reaching implications for the Middle East, potentially easing regional tensions and impacting energy markets. However, they also warn that past attempts at reaching durable agreements have repeatedly collapsed due to mistrust and shifting political dynamics.
In Tehran, state media maintained a cautious tone, emphasizing that Iran would not rush into any deal without guarantees of long-term compliance from the United States, recalling previous agreements that were later abandoned.
Meanwhile, political observers in Washington suggest that Trump’s statement may be aimed at signaling diplomatic momentum, even if formal confirmation is still pending.
As of now, no official joint statement has been issued by either government confirming the existence of a finalized agreement or a scheduled signing ceremony, leaving the status of the deal uncertain.
