By: Mushtaq A. Sarwar
Among the many national challenges facing Pakistan today, the economic crisis stands out as the most profound and complex. Shrinking foreign exchange reserves, widening trade deficits, currency devaluation, and industrial slowdown have effectively put the brakes on economic growth. In such circumstances, timely and effective steps towards economic stabilization became inevitable. It was against this backdrop that the government established the Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) in 2023—a move not merely administrative, but a strategic shift aimed at economic reform and revitalization.
Read also: SIFC playing a key role in promoting trade and investment in Pakistan
Pakistan has long struggled to attract consistent foreign investment. Multiple barriers—such as bureaucratic red tape, disjointed ministerial policies, political instability, unclear regulations, judicial delays, and corruption—have discouraged both domestic and international investors. Meanwhile, countries like China, Bangladesh, Vietnam, and even several African nations have surged ahead in drawing foreign capital. Despite being a large and promising market, Pakistan continued to fall off the radar of global investors.
The formation of the SIFC is particularly notable for its civil-military collaboration. Chaired by the Prime Minister, the council includes federal ministers, provincial chief ministers, the Chairman of the Board of Investment (BOI), and senior military officials. This collaborative model is designed to ensure quick, transparent decision-making, greater institutional harmony, and to signal to investors that Pakistan offers a safe, cohesive, and determined environment for investment.
SIFC initially prioritized sectors with high potential: agriculture and food processing, mining and minerals, energy, information technology, tourism and special economic zones, and livestock. Investment in these areas promises to inject new life into the economy, generate employment for millions of youth, facilitate technology transfer, boost exports, and spur industrial growth.
Within just months of its launch, the SIFC attracted significant interest from countries like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and China. Agreements have already been signed in minerals, oil and gas, renewable energy, and infrastructure development. The second phase of CPEC has also gained momentum under the council’s oversight. New avenues have opened up in the IT sector, with freelancers and startups receiving targeted government support.
One of SIFC’s key successes has been restoring investor confidence. When investors see that their concerns are addressed promptly, that there is government support at every step, and that their capital enjoys legal and financial protection, they are more likely to commit. As a result, there is a tangible improvement in Pakistan’s “Ease of Doing Business” outlook—though we are still in the early stages.
While SIFC has generally been welcomed, some circles have criticized the growing role of the military in this domain. The main concern is that military involvement could weaken civilian institutions and distort democratic structures. However, given the current performance crisis within many civil departments, military collaboration—if kept transparent, apolitical, and rooted in national interest—can be a strategic advantage.
A closer examination of Pakistan’s economic reality reveals that the criticism against military involvement in SIFC is often based on misinformation or a lack of insight. Those opposing this initiative often fail to grasp its transformative potential. In fact, the military’s inclusion has helped the council function with greater discipline, efficiency, and coherence—attributes often lacking in past investment frameworks. Where once departments worked in silos, the SIFC now enables coordinated and swift decision-making.
Security concerns have historically deterred foreign investors. The military’s role reassures them that their investments are protected by the full weight of state institutions. Moreover, the military has helped cut through bureaucratic delays that once stalled key investment projects. Under its supervision, decisions are now implemented promptly and effectively.
Globally, there is growing recognition that economic security is integral to national security. In a country like Pakistan, where economic instability can directly impact internal stability, military participation in such a council is not just logical—it’s strategic. It’s not about power grabs; it’s about survival, growth, and national resilience.
Critics often propagate the notion that the military is encroaching on civilian authority. In reality, decisions within the SIFC are made jointly by civilian and military representatives. The military acts as a facilitator and overseer, not as a decision-maker. Opponents cite past military interventions as a reason for skepticism. However, the current context is entirely different—this is not interference, but cooperative problem-solving in a time of economic emergency.
Since SIFC’s inception, the pace and scale of investment interest from countries like Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and China have significantly increased—something that may not have been possible under traditional bureaucratic mechanisms. Ignoring this fact while fixating solely on the military’s role reflects a biased perspective. The economic challenges Pakistan faces today demand unorthodox, urgent, and effective measures. The creation of SIFC and the military’s participation in it are strategic decisions that have, so far, yielded positive results.
Unwarranted criticism of such a national initiative not only undermines the council’s credibility but also goes against Pakistan’s broader economic interests. It would be fair to say that the military’s involvement in SIFC is a wise, timely, and entirely constructive step—criticisms of it are often rooted more in conjecture than in fact.
SIFC has the potential to become a game-changer. If driven with sincerity, transparency, and performance, this council could lead Pakistan toward self-reliance, industrialization, and economic stability. But for this to happen, consistency in policy, insulation from political meddling, and a results-based approach are imperative. The SIFC is more than just a council—it is an opportunity. An opportunity for Pakistan to rewrite its economic future. And if we fail to seize it, history may not be kind.
About the Author
